David Phillip Vetter was a boy from Shenandoah, Texas, United States who suffered from a rare genetic disease now known as severe combined immune deficiency syndrome (SCID). Forced to live in a sterile environment, he became popular with the media as the boy in the plastic bubble.
David's parents first son died seven months after birth. Doctors said that the baby boy had been born with a defective thymus, a gland which is important in the functioning of the immune system, due to a genetic condition, SCID. Each further son the couple might conceive would have a 50% chance of inheriting the same condition. The doctors from Baylor College of Medicine told the Vetters that if they had another child with SCID, the child could be placed in a sterile isolator until a bone marrow transplant could be performed, using the older sister, Katherine, as a donor.
A special sterilized cocoon bed was prepared for David at his birth. Less than 10 seconds after being removed from his mother's womb, David entered the plastic germ-free environment that would be his home for most of his life.
The doctors had decided that a bone marrow transplant might give David's immune system a jump start; however they had expected that David's sister, Katherine, would be a match. Unfortunately, that was not the case. Now, what was set up as a temporary solution had become his home, and as he grew, they had to allocate a hospital room in which he could live. As the years went by, David moved to other environments in the hospital, each one bigger to fit him and the bubble.
The researchers and his parents tried to give him a life as normal as possible: he had formal education and watched TV (the Hospital provided him with a small television set in his bubble). However, he longed to participate in the outside world that he could see out the window and on television. He said on one occasion: "Whatever I do depends on what somebody else decides I do. Why school? Why did you make me learn to read? What good will it do? I won't ever be able to do anything anyway. So why? You tell me why."
When David was four years old, he discovered he could poke holes in his cocoon using a butterfly syringe that was left in his possession by accident. This led his doctor to tell David about germs and David's special condition for the first time. Untill he was five, he aready recognized his difference and dreaded what the future held - limited choices, feelings of alienation and an increased need to be polite and compliant so as not to reveal his anger.
Water, air, food, diapers, clothes, all were disinfected with special cleaning agents before entering his cocoon. He was handled only through special plastic gloves attached to the walls. Before anything could go into the bubble, extra glue and labels would be removed, the product would be placed in a chamber filled with ethylene oxide gas for four hours at 140 degrees Fahrenheit (60˚C), and then aerated for a period of one to seven days before it could finally go in the bubble.
The bubble had very loud motors that would keep it inflated, which made it difficult for David to have conversations and for people listening to hear him. When David was three, a playroom was added to his bubble, measuring 11 feet (3.4 m) long, six and a half feet wide and eight feet tall.
When a United Press International photographer arrived to document David's first venture into his new playroom, David refused to go into the new addition to his bubble. David's mother called in Mary Murphy, a woman working on her doctorate in psychology and who had met David once before. Murphy convinced David to go into the playroom section to get a better glimpse of a goldfish she held, and she was then invited back for therapy sessions with David.
By 1974 around age 3, David could spend up to two or three weeks at a time at his parents' home in Conroe, Texas in a bubble set up for him there. When he was home, his sister would sleep in the living room next to his bubble. The two siblings were close, although they would sometimes even have physical fights and shoving matches using the gloves into the bubble. Once, David punched Katherine using the gloves and then went to the other side of the bubble, where he couldn't be reached with the gloves. However, in the end Katherine would have the upper hand in their disagreements: she could threaten to unplug his bubble, which she did a few times. Even if his primary bubble deflated, he had a separate area he could go into while he asked her to plug the bubble back in.
After many years, David's situation became unbearable. The small expectations for finding a cure were still the same as a preteen as when he was a baby. Doctors feared that as a teenager he would become even more unpredictable and uncontrollable. The U.S. government spoke about cutting the research funding as it showed no results and there was a growing debate over the ethics of that experiment, with public opinion becoming less supportive of the project. A total of more than $1.3 million was spent on David's care.
David did have friends and classmates who would come to his house to play with him, and in one case, a friend arranged for a special showing of Return of the Jedi at a local movie theatre that David could watch from his transport bubble, used to take him from his home to the hospital.
In 1983, at the advice of the original trio of doctors who had encouraged them to have David in the first place, David's parents decided to allow his medical team to perform an unmatched bone marrow transplant, with marrow donated by his sister Katherine. Attempts to find a matched bone marrow donor since his birth had been unsuccessful, and advances had recently been made in unmatched bone marrow operations. Baylor filmed the operation against David's wishes, and the marrow was given to David through intravenous lines running into the bubble.
The 1984 transplant operation went well, and for a few months hope was high that David would be able to leave the bubble. However, a few months after the operation, David became sick for the first time in his life; he started having diarrhea, fever and severe vomiting from intestinal bleeding. These symptoms were so severe that David had to be taken out of the bubble for treatment. In response to a direct question from his father on whether he wished to be taken out of the bubble, David replied, "Daddy, I will agree to anything to feel better." Out of the bubble, he continued to get worse and sank into a coma; his mother was able to touch his skin for the first and last time before he died. He died on February 22, 1984 of Burkitt's lymphoma at the age of 12.
Via: [link]
Images source: [link]
David Vetter image gallery:[link]














This is the saddest thing I have ever read.
ReplyDeletewow this is very sad, poor kid......now to watch bubble boy the comedy......great informative post!
ReplyDeleteBraze little boy, such a shame it had a sad ending xx
ReplyDeleteWow, I had no idea such a story existed. I thought it was all Hollywood stuff. That is such a sad story, but what more could be done at that time?
ReplyDeleteTruly a captivating, make-you-think kind of story..
ReplyDeleteThanks for the post!
With 50% chance of getting the decease and a (very) long shot of finding a bone marrow donor.., they never should have gotten the kid, nor should they have been encouraged by the doctors to have this "experiment".
ReplyDeleteEspecially when you already have lost a son... criminal.
And yes.., it was a very brave boy.
I live in the The Woodlands,Texas right next to the town where David lived. His name is still remembered and he has an elementary school named after him. This a great story.
ReplyDeleteA human life at such a great cost to society. Should lives like David's be prevented?
ReplyDeleteAh, the wonders of modern medicine!
ReplyDeleteThe medical team should have had their licences revoked for what they did to that poor child from the suggestion of his conception to his death. His parents were also unbelievable selfish to risk having a baby that only had a one in two risk of having the condition - although I'm sure they were pursuaded by the doctors.
ReplyDeleteThis poor child had no quality of life, no human touch. Such a tragedy. He was a science project to the doctors involved. No human being should being subjected to what this young boy was. It's heartbreaking.
I COMPLETELY agree with you. I read his parents letter to the publishing company that attempted to publish Mary Murphy's book about the struggle David's life was. They were COMPLETELY in denial of his dispair. They denied his reality, making him feel even lonelier. They sounds like totally unaware, emotionally ignorant people. How can ANYONE believe a trapped child could have been healthy and happy. It blows my mind how detached and ignorant these beliefs are. It makes me deeply sad and angry that a little child had to live a life of such extreme social, emotional deprivation.
Delete@Rogiers
ReplyDeleteObviously you never had a kid of your own. If you were a parent, having a son/daughter is the most amazing thing in your life. This "experiment" was a chance for the kid to heal, to experience the world rather than live in a bubble, to feel his mother's warmth; which you probably lacked.
Don't say shit until you've felt what they felt. It's not the parent's fault that they have this gene.
Your desperate desire to have a child DOES NOT excuse placing a child in a horrible situation. THis kid was severely depressed an anxious. This was a poorly informed, selfish decision. This is WHY this is NOT legal anymore. It's torturing for a human being to be deprived of human touch and being able to live, run, dance, touch trees, etc... Having a kid and putting him in a bubble was idiotic and selfish. So dont you put adults' desperate wants above a little child's right to a decent life. David lived in a fucking cage!
DeleteYes maybe it was selfish; but the doctors and parents obviously hoped a cure would be found. I don't think they were being "desperately" selfish; i think they were just human.It is such a shame this story ended in such a horrific way though.
DeleteHe isn't brave. He didn't have any choice.
ReplyDeleteRogier, though I do understand your opinion, I don't agree. The odds 50/50 are quite high, true, but it could've worked out fine. Second, the article mentions that a boy would have 50/50 odds, that implies that a girl would'nt.
ReplyDeleteI hope you're a troll. Seriously, "... at such a great cost to society." Did you read how much his total treatment cost? $1.2 million?
ReplyDeleteAnd how much has BP dropped to buy off its victims? 3 to 5 billion (with a "b") dollars? And how many huge corporations have these concentrations of wealth?
Welcome back to the middle ages, folks. Enjoy being vassals to our new "protectors" and overlords.
Very sad.
ReplyDeleteRemember, the 1.2 million listed is in 1971-83 dollars. AND the little boy deserved every penny spent because of what his parents and doctors gambled on. I cannot imagine a life without touch. THAT is the saddest part of this.
Sounds like he was a smart person. He knew what they had done and yet he had to live with it. That is what
him brave. Living with it.
P.s... the amount was 1.3 million... not that it matters much, just correcting my comment above.
ReplyDeleteI am glad he did have the suit from NASA. Better to have limited movement and contact than none.
But we can never know what David went through and our opinions don't mean much in relation to what he went through.
That said, this story, David's life allows us to examine our beliefs and values.
I agree, I think it was extremely selfish of the parents to conceive a child that they knew had a 50% survival rate. Having children is something the PARENTS want. This poor child was born because his parents wanted a kid.
ReplyDelete@Tararararah - you said "If you were a parent, having a son/daughter is the most amazing thing in your life." In YOUR life. How happy was this child in HIS life? Not very, from what the story tells.
I completely agree with you Anonymouos. Putting an adult's desperate wants above the wellbeing of a little child is ridiculous. It's immature to only think of what one wants and not think of the wellbeing of a child. This kid was severely depressed and had an extremely deprived life. He himself would say it wasn't worth it at times. They made this little boy go through hell. He WAS ALWAYS most important, being HE was the inocent child. They missed that HUGE fact in all their selfish decisions. They did it for the good of the parents an for the good of science. WHAT ABOUT HIM!!!!
DeleteHow sad that this boy was forced to live a life like that. It makes me angry to hear about things like this. I agree that the parents were unbelievably selfish in this case. They already had a healthy child and one who died. They really just HAD to have another child so badly that they would knowingly conceive one with a 50/50 chance of having this condition? Makes me sick. Survival of the fittest occurs in nature for a reason. We need to stop defying nature in everything we do as humans.
ReplyDelete@Tararararah
ReplyDeleteYeah, if Rogiers had had a kid of his own he would know its such an awesome feeling having a kid that it more than makes up for the suffering that his condition will cause him.
It is an awesome feeling to have a kid of your own, but I still would not have done it with those odds. When they said he was put in his bubble less than 10 seconds after his birth, it broke my heart. I can't think of anything worse for this kid to go through.
ReplyDeleteI don't see that kid smiling in any pic...
ReplyDeletethere is a real risk to every disease and every condition at birth and later in life. Now alone the risk of Autism is real to everyone. I have a few and I am so glad my mother continued pregnancy against doctors advice. As others suggest, is that reason to not live at all or bring a child to life.. seriously you people that disagree with the "science project" need to look at the finer things in life. Even-though his life was far from normal, the chance was there that he could live a normal life. To negate that possibility, at any time, should be criminal. That research/experiment has saved thousands of lives and truly he should be remembered as a hero to everyone. The human condition is very complex, but in the end we are just mammals.
ReplyDeleteI do
ReplyDeletei see him smiling in two pics. one could be just a photo that just LoOks like smiling, he is not smiling with his eyes.
ReplyDeletebut the nasa photo looks like a genuine smile.
after my throat surgeries (14) as a child i had to spend a little time in a bubble, giving my throat a sterile place to heal.
it sucked. and it was only a couple weeks at a time.
the thing i hated most, was the smell. it was repulsive and i couldn't get away from it.
I would get scolded when i unzipped it at the corner. clearly, it was not a life or death situation, but i was required to stay in it.
Haha I am glad to know that there are people out their who think that the great feeling of being a parent is more important than considering what your child might have to go through. That is very selfish, putting your wants and needs first to the child who you so dearly "care" for? Caring for the kid would be not having it, or loving the one that you have already. And if having another kid is that important, adopt.
ReplyDeleteFirst a problem (in this case a genetic mutation likely caused by exposure to toxins or radiation) is created out of some kind of scientific experiment which poses itself as some kind of benefit to the human race, necessity or technological progression. The industry or industries creating the problem make a huge profit from selling the problem. Then science gets more funding to "take care" of the problem, making it more out of hand than it was before. This is the cycle modern homo sapiens have been trapped in for quite some time. Whilst this story is sad, it is also sad (and downright disconcerting) that a huge portion of life on this planet - the human race included - is being "taken care of" in a similar fashion as this boy was. Furthermore all of our daily habits are adding fuel to this fire. As humans we should all be practicing ways of living which are mutually beneficial to ourselves, each other and all life on this planet. The job science needs to be doing now is researching such ways. The job of politicians and law makers needs to be providing the tools and education needed to ensure these ways are practiced by the populations they supposedly serve instead of helping to perpetuate the cycle of imbalance which the planet is experiencing. Instead of arguing amongst ourselves and focusing on our petty disagreements we should all be working together to make sure this happens. This has to happen to break the cycle.
ReplyDeleteHow can a someone reading this decide weather or not he had quality of life?
ReplyDeletethe way that the article was written is biased.
I dont think that this was the parents fault or the childs or even modern science.
things happen in life that no one could have prevented.
its a tragedy that he died so young but a miracle he lived at all.
Its hard to believe the experience this family must have gone through. The fact that they tried so hard to keep him alive with their "science projects" fully atests to that. It isn't selfish to want a child.
i dont think his life was even partially a waste.
Sometimes things just dont work out.
Interesting how when explaining what wouldn't have happened if you grandmother had aborted your aunt all you have to say is is the wonderful things that YOU would've never been able to experience and the things OTHER PEOPLE wouldn't have been able to have experienced. Nowhere in there do you say a single thing about your aunt. Just how other people got to be happy through her suffering. How nice.
ReplyDeleteAre you kidding?
ReplyDelete"A human life at such a great cost to society." Is that really what you're thinking about after reading this? Because if it is I feel extremely sorry for you. Honestly I agree there is nothing more beautiful than having a child, but to be selfish enough to have a child knowing there's such a great risk for him to suffer such...and for those of you who think 50 percent is not so bad, I hardly believe you would gamble another persons happiness on such high a number.
Such a tragic story.
How can a someone reading this decide weather or not he had quality of life?
ReplyDeletethe way that the article was written is biased.
I dont think that this was the parents fault or the childs or even modern science.
things happen in life that no one could have prevented.
its a tragedy that he died so young but a miracle he lived at all.this is good and helpful site.
Its hard to believe the experience this family must have gone through. The fact that they tried so hard to keep him alive with their "science projects" fully atests to that. It isn't selfish to want a child.
i dont think his life was even partially a waste.
Sometimes things just dont work out.
It's ridiculous for you to think he might have a good life while living his entire life deprived of touch and physical freedom. You need to read a lot and maybe go to therapy. You think logically and not emotionally. This kid was severely anxious and depressed. YOu need to read more about his story. KNOW adults wants ARE NOT more important than children's rights to have their emotional and physical needs met. HE was NOT getting that while trapped in a bubble. It's obvious. Could you live happinly in your room for your entire early childhood? IF you say yes, you are more emotionally stunted than I though.
Deletethis is human life, any things can be happens in this world.
ReplyDeleteits not fault of parents or any its a Past Karma law of case & effect.
OH no, I'm afraid the answer is moops.
ReplyDeleteThe parents had no idea that their son was going to be in the bubble for that long. I do believe they thought it would be less than a year, initially, because they thought they would have a cure.
ReplyDeleteI am sure that if they knew he would never leave the bubble, they may have made a different decision.
But once the child is here, you will do just about anything to keep him alive, or, in this case, healthy. It just went on for far too long.
There was no cure at the moment and that IS PRECISELY what Drs missed to inform the parents about. THERE WAS THAT POSSIBILITY. There was that risk. Blind optimism is a form of stupidity and denial. The point was they missed thinking about the worst possible consequences. That's what makes decisions BAD decisions. Doing that in the science field is irresponsible and idiotic. ESPECIALLY when you are dealing with human lives. Educate yourself about ethics. There is a good reason why this is illegal now adays.
DeleteThe problem with being in a germ free enviroment is that you don't build any immunity. So he was riddled with all these new things that he was never exposed to and not a chance to fight it off bc he was never given the chance to build anitbodies.
ReplyDeleteYou simply DO NOT put a human being in a fucking bubble without having a plan. Simply idiotic. Thank goodness this is illegal now. It's illegal for a GOOD REASON! It was a horrible way of living. Poor child. Those who identify with the "poor" adults who wanted a kid at the expense of giving him a ridiculous quality of life, and who believe science is above humanity are delayed in emotional development. AGAIN, there is a reason why this is illegal now.
ReplyDelete